<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Derrida Sucks. Guattari, too.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nerdgod.com/blog/2007/07/13/why-derrida-sucks-guattari-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nerdgod.com/blog/2007/07/13/why-derrida-sucks-guattari-too/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:41:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdgod.com/blog/2007/07/13/why-derrida-sucks-guattari-too/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdgod.com/blog/?p=29#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried reading Derrida&#039;s &quot;Specters of Marx&quot; for the past month. I&#039;ve re-read the first chapter about eight times, and I&#039;m beginning to wonder if I&#039;ll ever understand it. After the fourth re-read, I thought I had a breakthrough only to later doubt myself because my comprehension seemed too basic. It&#039;s not just the diction or grammar that gets to me, but it&#039;s specifically his style of writing. After several days in my graduate linguistics class, I began questioning whether even my professor understood it. Everything she said seemed superficial and something I could have easily read off wikipedia in five minutes instead of attending three weeks of classes. I remember Chomsky once called Derrida&#039;s writing &quot;pretentious rhetoric&quot;. Chomsky also admits he doesn&#039;t understand Derrida&#039;s writing. I don&#039;t feel so bad about it except I have a paper due in two weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried reading Derrida&#8217;s &#8220;Specters of Marx&#8221; for the past month. I&#8217;ve re-read the first chapter about eight times, and I&#8217;m beginning to wonder if I&#8217;ll ever understand it. After the fourth re-read, I thought I had a breakthrough only to later doubt myself because my comprehension seemed too basic. It&#8217;s not just the diction or grammar that gets to me, but it&#8217;s specifically his style of writing. After several days in my graduate linguistics class, I began questioning whether even my professor understood it. Everything she said seemed superficial and something I could have easily read off wikipedia in five minutes instead of attending three weeks of classes. I remember Chomsky once called Derrida&#8217;s writing &#8220;pretentious rhetoric&#8221;. Chomsky also admits he doesn&#8217;t understand Derrida&#8217;s writing. I don&#8217;t feel so bad about it except I have a paper due in two weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

